Talk:Interacting Particle Systems - Revision history

imported>Milton: moved Talk:Interactive Particle Systems to Talk:Interacting Particle Systems: Interactive particle systems is definitively not in the literature

2012-02-23T18:26:50Z

moved Talk:Interactive Particle Systems to Talk:Interacting Particle Systems: Interactive particle systems is definitively not in the literature

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:26, 23 February 2012
(No difference)

imported>Luis: moved Talk:Particle Systems to Talk:Interactive Particle Systems: agreed on the discussion page

2012-02-13T21:09:36Z

moved Talk:Particle Systems to Talk:Interactive Particle Systems: agreed on the discussion page

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:09, 13 February 2012
(No difference)

imported>Milton at 13:24, 13 February 2012

2012-02-13T13:24:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:24, 13 February 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:

	What could be a more specific title for this article? [[User:Luis\|Luis]] 16:01, 10 February 2012 (CST)		What could be a more specific title for this article? [[User:Luis\|Luis]] 16:01, 10 February 2012 (CST)

			I think that "Interacting Particle Systems" would be a more accurate name. --[[User:Milton\|Milton]] 07:24, 13 February 2012 (CST)

imported>Luis at 22:01, 10 February 2012

2012-02-10T22:01:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:01, 10 February 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Indeed, I think ''particle systems'' is a little bit too wide: it may include stochastic particle systems or also the particle systems from kinetic theory. It seems that in the literature the name ''interacting particle system'' is only used for stochastic systems à la Liggett (see also ''Scaling Limits of Interacting Particle Systems'' by Kipnis-Landim)--[[User:Milton\|Milton]] 11:58, 9 February 2012 (CST).		Indeed, I think ''particle systems'' is a little bit too wide: it may include stochastic particle systems or also the particle systems from kinetic theory. It seems that in the literature the name ''interacting particle system'' is only used for stochastic systems à la Liggett (see also ''Scaling Limits of Interacting Particle Systems'' by Kipnis-Landim)--[[User:Milton\|Milton]] 11:58, 9 February 2012 (CST).

			What could be a more specific title for this article? [[User:Luis\|Luis]] 16:01, 10 February 2012 (CST)

imported>Milton at 17:58, 9 February 2012

2012-02-09T17:58:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:58, 9 February 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I thought so too, until I started reading Liggett's book "Interacting particle systems", I haven't found a formal definition yet (maybe its the same as in definition as for free boundary problems....) but all of them seem to be Markov processes where the state space is a field (the most famous example is the stochastic Ising model). I will dwell on those things in this article ([[User:Nestor\|Nestor]] 21:39, 2 February 2012 (CST))		I thought so too, until I started reading Liggett's book "Interacting particle systems", I haven't found a formal definition yet (maybe its the same as in definition as for free boundary problems....) but all of them seem to be Markov processes where the state space is a field (the most famous example is the stochastic Ising model). I will dwell on those things in this article ([[User:Nestor\|Nestor]] 21:39, 2 February 2012 (CST))

			Indeed, I think ''particle systems'' is a little bit too wide: it may include stochastic particle systems or also the particle systems from kinetic theory. It seems that in the literature the name ''interacting particle system'' is only used for stochastic systems à la Liggett (see also ''Scaling Limits of Interacting Particle Systems'' by Kipnis-Landim)--[[User:Milton\|Milton]] 11:58, 9 February 2012 (CST).

imported>Nestor at 03:39, 3 February 2012

2012-02-03T03:39:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:39, 2 February 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I thought that ''particle systems'' was a generic name for a variety of models. I will check because if that is true this article should have a more specific name. ([[User:Luis\|Luis]] 10:56, 2 February 2012 (CST))		I thought that ''particle systems'' was a generic name for a variety of models. I will check because if that is true this article should have a more specific name. ([[User:Luis\|Luis]] 10:56, 2 February 2012 (CST))

			I thought so too, until I started reading Liggett's book "Interacting particle systems", I haven't found a formal definition yet (maybe its the same as in definition as for free boundary problems....) but all of them seem to be Markov processes where the state space is a field (the most famous example is the stochastic Ising model). I will dwell on those things in this article ([[User:Nestor\|Nestor]] 21:39, 2 February 2012 (CST))

imported>Luis: Created page with "I thought that ''particle systems'' was a generic name for a variety of models. I will check because if that is true this article should have a more specific name. (~~~~)"

2012-02-02T16:56:10Z

Created page with "I thought that ''particle systems'' was a generic name for a variety of models. I will check because if that is true this article should have a more specific name. (~~~~)"

New page

I thought that ''particle systems'' was a generic name for a variety of models. I will check because if that is true this article should have a more specific name. ([[User:Luis|Luis]] 10:56, 2 February 2012 (CST))