Starting page and De Giorgi-Nash-Moser theorem: Difference between pages
imported>Luis (Created page with "In this wiki we collect several result about nonlocal elliptic and parabolic equations. If you want to know what a nonlocal equation refers to, a good starting point would be th...") |
imported>Luis |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The De Giorgi-Nash-Moser theorem provides Holder estimates and the Harnack inequality for uniformly elliptic or parabolic equations with rough coefficients in divergence form. | |||
The equation is | |||
\[ \mathrm{div} A(x) \nabla u(x) = \partial_i a_{ij}(x) \partial_j u(x) = 0, \] | |||
in the elliptic case, or | |||
\[ u_t = \mathrm{div} A(x,t) \nabla u(x). \] | |||
Here $A = \{a_{ij}\}$ is a matrix valued function in $L^\infty$ satisfying the uniform ellipticity condition for some $\lambda>0$, | |||
\[ \langle A v,v \rangle \geq \lambda |v|^2,\] | |||
for every $v \in \R^n$, uniformly in space and time. | |||
The | The corresponding result in non divergence form is [[Krylov-Safonov theorem]]. | ||
For nonlocal equations, there are analogous results both for [[Holder estimates]] and the [[Harnack inequality]]. | |||
== Elliptic version == | |||
For the result in the elliptic case, we assume that the equation | |||
\[ \mathrm{div} A(x) \nabla u(x) = 0 \] | |||
is satisfied in the unit ball $B_1$ of $\R^n$. | |||
===Holder estimate=== | |||
The Holder estimate says that if $u$ is an $L^2$ solution to a uniformly elliptic divergence form equation as above, then $u$ is Holder continuous in $B_{1/2}$ and | |||
\[ ||u||_{C^\alpha(B_{1/2})} \leq C ||u||_{L^2(B_1)}.\] | |||
The constants $C$ and $\alpha>0$ depend on $n$ (dimension), $\lambda$ and $||A||_{L^\infty}$. | |||
The result can be scaled to balls of arbitrary radius $r>0$ to obtain | |||
\[ [u]_{C^\alpha(B_{r/2})} \leq C \frac{||u||_{L^2(B_r)}}{r^\alpha}.\] | |||
Moreover, by covering an arbitrary domain $\Omega$ with balls, one can show that a solution to the equation in $\Omega$ is $C^\alpha$ in the interior of $\Omega$. | |||
=== | ===Harnack inequality=== | ||
The | The [[Harnack inequality]] says that if $u$ is a non negative solution of the equation in $B_1$, then its minimum controls its maximum in $B_{1/2}$: | ||
\[ \max_{B_{1/2}} u \leq C \min_{B_{1/2}} u.\] | |||
The constant $C$ depends on $n$, $\lambda$ and $||A||_{L^\infty}$ only. | |||
===Minimizers of convex functionals=== | |||
The theorem of De Giorgi, Nash and Moser was used originally to solve one of the famous Hilbert problems. The question was whether the minimizers of Dirichlet integrals | |||
\[ J(u) := \int_{\Omega} F(\nabla u) \mathrm{d} x,\] | |||
are always smooth if $F$ is smooth and strictly convex. The theorem of De Giorgi-Nash-Moser in its elliptic form can be applied to the differential quotients of the minimizer of $J$ to show that the solution is $C^{1,\alpha}$. Once that initial regularity is obtained, further regularity follows by [[bootstrapping]] with the [[Schauder estimates]] and the smoothness of $F$. | |||
Note that in order to apply the theorem to these nonlinear equations, it is very important that no smoothness assumption on the coefficients $A(x)$ is made. | |||
=== | == Parabolic version == | ||
For the result in the parabolic case, we assume that the equation | |||
\[ u_t - \mathrm{div} A(x) \nabla u(x) = 0 \] | |||
is satisfied in the unit cylinder $(0,1] \times B_1$ of $\R \times \R^n$. | |||
===Holder estimate=== | |||
The Holder estimate says that if $u$ is an $L^2$ solution to a uniformly elliptic divergence form equation as above, then $u$ is Holder continuous in $[1/2,1] \times B_{1/2}$ and | |||
\[ ||u||_{C^\alpha([1/2,1] \times B_{1/2})} \leq C ||u||_{L^2([0,1] \times B_1)}.\] | |||
The constants $C$ and $\alpha>0$ depend on $n$ (dimension), $\lambda$ and $||A||_{L^\infty}$. | |||
===Harnack inequality=== | |||
The [[Harnack inequality]] says that if $u$ is a non negative solution of the equation in $[0,1] \times B_1$, then its minimum controls its maximum in a previous time: | |||
\[ \sup_{[1/4,1/2] \times B_{1/2}} u \leq \inf_{[3/4,0] \times B_{1/2}} u. \] | |||
===Gradient flows=== | |||
The parabolic version of the theory can be used to show that the solutions to gradient flow equations with strictly convex energies are smooth. | |||
\[ u_t + \partial_u J[u] = u_t - \mathrm{div} \left( (\partial_i F)(\nabla u) \partial_i u \right) = 0.\] | |||
The idea of the proof is that the derivatives of $u$ (or its differential quotients) satisfy an equation with rough but uniformly elliptic coefficients. | |||
Revision as of 14:14, 14 March 2012
The De Giorgi-Nash-Moser theorem provides Holder estimates and the Harnack inequality for uniformly elliptic or parabolic equations with rough coefficients in divergence form.
The equation is \[ \mathrm{div} A(x) \nabla u(x) = \partial_i a_{ij}(x) \partial_j u(x) = 0, \] in the elliptic case, or \[ u_t = \mathrm{div} A(x,t) \nabla u(x). \] Here $A = \{a_{ij}\}$ is a matrix valued function in $L^\infty$ satisfying the uniform ellipticity condition for some $\lambda>0$, \[ \langle A v,v \rangle \geq \lambda |v|^2,\] for every $v \in \R^n$, uniformly in space and time.
The corresponding result in non divergence form is Krylov-Safonov theorem.
For nonlocal equations, there are analogous results both for Holder estimates and the Harnack inequality.
Elliptic version
For the result in the elliptic case, we assume that the equation \[ \mathrm{div} A(x) \nabla u(x) = 0 \] is satisfied in the unit ball $B_1$ of $\R^n$.
Holder estimate
The Holder estimate says that if $u$ is an $L^2$ solution to a uniformly elliptic divergence form equation as above, then $u$ is Holder continuous in $B_{1/2}$ and \[ ||u||_{C^\alpha(B_{1/2})} \leq C ||u||_{L^2(B_1)}.\] The constants $C$ and $\alpha>0$ depend on $n$ (dimension), $\lambda$ and $||A||_{L^\infty}$.
The result can be scaled to balls of arbitrary radius $r>0$ to obtain \[ [u]_{C^\alpha(B_{r/2})} \leq C \frac{||u||_{L^2(B_r)}}{r^\alpha}.\]
Moreover, by covering an arbitrary domain $\Omega$ with balls, one can show that a solution to the equation in $\Omega$ is $C^\alpha$ in the interior of $\Omega$.
Harnack inequality
The Harnack inequality says that if $u$ is a non negative solution of the equation in $B_1$, then its minimum controls its maximum in $B_{1/2}$: \[ \max_{B_{1/2}} u \leq C \min_{B_{1/2}} u.\] The constant $C$ depends on $n$, $\lambda$ and $||A||_{L^\infty}$ only.
Minimizers of convex functionals
The theorem of De Giorgi, Nash and Moser was used originally to solve one of the famous Hilbert problems. The question was whether the minimizers of Dirichlet integrals \[ J(u) := \int_{\Omega} F(\nabla u) \mathrm{d} x,\] are always smooth if $F$ is smooth and strictly convex. The theorem of De Giorgi-Nash-Moser in its elliptic form can be applied to the differential quotients of the minimizer of $J$ to show that the solution is $C^{1,\alpha}$. Once that initial regularity is obtained, further regularity follows by bootstrapping with the Schauder estimates and the smoothness of $F$.
Note that in order to apply the theorem to these nonlinear equations, it is very important that no smoothness assumption on the coefficients $A(x)$ is made.
Parabolic version
For the result in the parabolic case, we assume that the equation \[ u_t - \mathrm{div} A(x) \nabla u(x) = 0 \] is satisfied in the unit cylinder $(0,1] \times B_1$ of $\R \times \R^n$.
Holder estimate
The Holder estimate says that if $u$ is an $L^2$ solution to a uniformly elliptic divergence form equation as above, then $u$ is Holder continuous in $[1/2,1] \times B_{1/2}$ and \[ ||u||_{C^\alpha([1/2,1] \times B_{1/2})} \leq C ||u||_{L^2([0,1] \times B_1)}.\] The constants $C$ and $\alpha>0$ depend on $n$ (dimension), $\lambda$ and $||A||_{L^\infty}$.
Harnack inequality
The Harnack inequality says that if $u$ is a non negative solution of the equation in $[0,1] \times B_1$, then its minimum controls its maximum in a previous time: \[ \sup_{[1/4,1/2] \times B_{1/2}} u \leq \inf_{[3/4,0] \times B_{1/2}} u. \]
Gradient flows
The parabolic version of the theory can be used to show that the solutions to gradient flow equations with strictly convex energies are smooth. \[ u_t + \partial_u J[u] = u_t - \mathrm{div} \left( (\partial_i F)(\nabla u) \partial_i u \right) = 0.\] The idea of the proof is that the derivatives of $u$ (or its differential quotients) satisfy an equation with rough but uniformly elliptic coefficients.