M408M Learning Module Pages
Main page Chapter 10: Parametric Equations and Polar CoordinatesChapter 12: Vectors and the Geometry of SpaceChapter 13: Vector FunctionsChapter 14: Partial DerivativesLearning module LM 14.1: Functions of 2 or 3 variables:Learning module LM 14.3: Partial derivatives:Learning module LM 14.4: Tangent planes and linear approximations:Tangent planesLinearization Quadratic approximations and concavity Learning module LM 14.5: Differentiability and the chain rule:Learning module LM 14.6: Gradients and directional derivatives:Learning module LM 14.7: Local maxima and minima:Learning module LM 14.8: Absolute maxima and Lagrange multipliers:Chapter 15: Multiple Integrals |
Quadratic approximations and concavitySecond order partial derivatives are connected with
'concavity', but the relationship is more subtle than in the one
variable case. If the tangent plane at a point $P(a,\,b,\, f(a,\,b))$
on the graph of $z = f(x,\, y)$ gives the best Linear
Approximation
$$L(x,\,y) \ = \ f(a,\,b) + f_x\Bigl|_{(a,\,b)}
(x-a) + f_y\Bigl|_{(a,\,b)}(y-b) $$ to $f$ near $P$, then we
can expect that some Quadric surface will give the best Quadratic
Approximation to $f$ near $P$. Just as the best Linear
Approximation is the degree 1 Taylor polynomial centered at $(a,\, b)$
for $f$, so this best Quadratic Approximation is the degree 2 Taylor
polynomial. For brevity we'll speak of these degree one and degree two
Taylor polynomials as simply the respective Linear and Quadratic
Approximations to $z = f(x,\,y)$ at $(a,\,b)$.
But what does all this mean graphically for a function $z = f(x,\,y)$? Well, the graph of a linear equation $Ax + by+Cz=D$ is a plane, while the graph of a quadratic equation is a quadric surface. So near a point $(a,\, b)$ the Linear Approximation $L(x,\, y)$ at $(a,\, b)$ approximates the graph of $z = f(x,\,y)$ by a plane - the Tangent Plane - while the Quadratic Approximation $Q(x,\, y)$ at $(a,\,b)$ approximates the graph of $z = f(x,\,y)$ by a quadric surface such as a paraboloid, hyperbolic paraboloid, or a hyperboloid. To illustrate these ideas, let's compute some more Quadratic Approximations. Set
Do these seem reasonable given the graph of $f$ shown above? For a function $y = f(x)$ of one variable, the degree two approximating polynomial in $x$ would be a parabola, opening up or down, but in two variables things are more subtle because there are several possible approximating quadric surfaces. Question: all the definitions and calculations so far have been for functions $z = f(x,\,y)$ of two variables. Is it clear how to extend the definitions to a function $w = f(x,\, y,\, z)$ of three variables? Just as in one dimension, we can use higher derivatives to get an even more accurate approximation, and to express functions as power series.
|